Legal Opinion

Ahrens v. Ahrens

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court. — Hon. A. P. Barker, Judge. This is an action for partition. There was a demurrer to the petition, which challenged the alleged title of the plaintiffs. The demurrer being sustained, and -the plaintiffs refusing to plead further, the petition was dismissed, and they have appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.

Although in form this is an action for partition, in its real effect, it is an action to try the title of the plaintiffs to an undivided interest in certain land in Clinton County. The common source of title under which both parties claim was Bernard Ahrens, who died intestate December 18, 1860, seised of the undivided half of a quarter section of land; his brother, J. D. Ahrens, being seised of the other undivided half thereof. . Bernard left neither widow nor children. His mother, Trinke Ahrens, was his only surviving parent. He left surviving him two brothers and two sisters, the only…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lorieux v. KellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  2. Furenes v. MickelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Rheim v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Doehrel v. HillmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Krogan v. KinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bamforth v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Miller v. ClausenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Zschernig v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Pierson v. LawlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API