Legal Opinion
Faber v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 15, 1895No. Nos. 9545-(91)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, Twohy, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover damages for an alleged wrongful assault upon the plaintiff and his expulsion from the railway train of the defendant. Trial by the court, without a jury. Judgment ordered for the defendant, dismissing the action, and the plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The train in question was a motor or surburban train, from South St. Paul to St. Paul, a distance of some five miles, and consisted of ■a smoking car at the rear, and two passenger coaches in front of it. 'There were some 225 passengers on the train. It is claimed by the •defendant that in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Brumfield v. Consolidated Coach CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Martin v. the Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1911
- Jones v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896