Commonwealth v. Pennybaker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
Keith Pennybaker (“Pennybaker”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction of failure to comply with the sexual offender registration requirements imposed by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9799.10, et seq., also known as the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”). 1 We affirm.
Pennybaker was convicted of rape 2 at a non-jury trial in 1997. As a result thereof, he became subject to a mandatory registration requirement for sexual offenders. 3 Because rape is a Tier III sexual offense under SORNA, Pennybaker became subject to a lifetime…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. HainesworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlakneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com v. Williams, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Corliss, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Demark, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Haughwout, G., Sr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.