Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pennybaker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2015No. 1068 WDA 2014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

Keith Pennybaker (“Pennybaker”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction of failure to comply with the sexual offender registration requirements imposed by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9799.10, et seq., also known as the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”). 1 We affirm.

Pennybaker was convicted of rape 2 at a non-jury trial in 1997. As a result thereof, he became subject to a mandatory registration requirement for sexual offenders. 3 Because rape is a Tier III sexual offense under SORNA, Pennybaker became subject to a lifetime…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. HainesworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlakneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Com v. Williams, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Com. v. Corliss, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Demark, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Haughwout, G., Sr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API