Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fayette County Board of Commissioners v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 84

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1997No. 3426 C.D. 1995Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFlaherty, Judge

I respectfully concur and dissent. Although I agree with the majority that the *278grievance in the instant case was arbitrable, the majority did not go beyond that threshold. I feel that they should have reviewed the basis of the arbitration award which exceeded the power of the arbitrator when it modified the disciplinary action imposed on Correctional Officer, William Prinkey (Prin-key), by reinstating him after discharge when just cause for some form of discipline was found by the arbitrator.

Part I

The Fayette County Board of Commissioners (Commissioners) does not challenge the merits of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ellenbogen v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. Independent State Stores UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. County of Centre v. MusserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Pittsburgh Joint Collective Bargaining Committee v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API