Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Duncan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1918PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the chancery court of Alcorn connty. IioN. A. J. McINtyee, Chancellor. Habeas corpus proceedings by Harmon Dnncan b^' next frend, Amanda Dnncan, against Geo. B. Dnncan, and others. From a decree granting the petition, -Geo. B. Dnncan and others appeal. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, 0. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

George B. and Amanda Duncan were formerly husband and wife, and have one child, Harmon Duncan, a hoy, to determine the right to-the custody of which this habeas corpus proceeding was instituted, and who, when the decree appealed from was rendered, was seven years of age. In September, 1916, trouble arose between Mr. and Mrs. Duncan, because of which they finally separated in March following; George suing for and obtaining a divorce from Amanda on the ground of adultery on the 1.1th day of February, 1918, in the circuit court of Madison county,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cocke v. HannumMississippi Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mercier v. MercierMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hulett v. HulettMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Anderson v. WatkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Cassell v. CassellMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Torrence v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API