Legal Opinion

Price v. Confair

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1951No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Defendants made a written contract with Clover-dale Spring Co. on January 17, 1941, in which defendants agreed, inter alia, to furnish to seven named distributors, one of whom was the plaintiff, “all of their requirements of bottled Pepsi-Cola”. The contract was silent as to its duration and the sole question involved in the case is as to the period of the contract.

For many years prior to 1941 Cloverdale Spring Co. had granted the defendant bottling rights on a royalty basis, retaining however, the right to sell Pepsi-Cola to wholesalers and distributors in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Slonaker v. P. G. Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Coffin v. LandisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. Rossmassler v. SpielbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Weidman v. United Cigar Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Darlington v. General ElectricSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Martin v. Capital Cities Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Cummings v. Kelling Nut Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. FitzmartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API