Legal Opinion

Hustead v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1923No. 6590PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Conviction is for conspiracy to commit the crime of theft, with punishment at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

Appellant went to trial on a plea of “not guilty.” • After the State’s evidence was introduced the plea of “not guilty” was withdrawn and a plea of guilty entered. No bills of exception were reserved to any part of the proceedings, and no statement of facts adduced upon the trial accompanies the record. Appellant sought a new trial on the ground that his attorney coerced him into entering the plea of guilty. This necessarily raised an issue of fact for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nothaf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Jurado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Michael Highfill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  4. Michael Highfill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API