Meyer v. Parsons
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. M. B. Harrison, Peter J. Shields, and Hiram W. Johnson, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
Plaintiff had judgment hy default against defendant Parsons. The defendant Bowles answered, and on a trial the verdict and judgment were against him. From said judgment and from an order denying him a new trial the defendant Bowles appeals.
The complaint in the case sets forth facts showing a sale and delivery to defendants, and each of them, of a one-half interest in a saloon and fixtures and materials for carrying on said saloon, and alleges that the consideration for said sale was $250 and an agreement on the part of defendants, and each of them, to pay certain debts owing by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Furnas v. DurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Rector, Etc., of Trinity Church v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Banfield v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Campbell v. Parkway Surgery Center, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- In the Matter of William Rakestraw Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Marin Foods, Inc. v. Walter J. Hempy, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Montgomery v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Pray v. Trower Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.