Legal Opinion

Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Follett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1903No. 12,711PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Ed. L. Adams, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Hastings, C.

Appellants in this case, against whom a decree of foreclosure was rendered, set up four reasons why that decree should’ he reversed and one entered requiring the plaintiff and appellee to accept a deed of the mortgaged premises in full satisfaction of the mortgage debt:

First. That the petition makes an insufficient allegation as to a prior suit at law on which judgment was rendered for the debt secured by this mortgage, and execution *417issued and returned unsatisfied, in that the allegations fail to negative other proceedings to enforce that judgment.

The allegations in this behalf…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fairall v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API