Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 10, 1989No. Record 880099PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

In this appeal, we decide whether a parcel of land marked “Reserved” on a subdivision plat was dedicated to the public either when the plat was recorded or under common law principles. Further, we decide whether landowners with property which abuts the reserved parcel proved that they were entitled to a way of necessity across that parcel.

I

This suit began in June 1984, when Benjamin W. Watkins, Frank H. Watkins, Elsie W. Poole, Vernie Lee W. Ellswick, and Francis Watkins (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Watkins) sued the record owners of the parcel in question: Joseph and Annette…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Middleton v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  3. Brown v. Tazewell County Water & Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Sprott v. SprottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. American Small Business Investment Co. v. FrenzelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. R. A. Yancey Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  2. Brown v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. Carter v. County of HanoverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Clark v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  5. Ballagh v. GrayBedford County Circuit Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API