Legal Opinion

Hubenschmidt v. Shears

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1978No. Docket 60906, 61287PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue to be decided in these two cases is whether the results of a test for alcohol content of a blood sample taken from a dead body may be admitted as evidence in a wrongful death action brought by or against the decedent’s representative. We hold, that if the requisite foundation is established showing the integrity of the results, they may be admitted into evidence if they are found to be relevant. MRE 401.

I

David Miller’s (plaintiff) decedent, William Wicks, was the driver of a car which collided with a car being driven by Robert Duryea (defendant) on March 7, 1975. Plaintiffs decedent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lebel v. SwincickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. McNitt v. Citco Drilling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gard v. Michigan Produce HaulersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Hubenschmidt v. ShearsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Swickard v. Wayne County Medical ExaminerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Williams v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Burke v. Angies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. McLean v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Zyskowski v. HabelmannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API