Leedy v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bobbitt, C. J., and Draper, J.,
are of the opinion that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. Emmert and Gilkison, J. J. are of the opinion that the judgment of the court below should be reversed. Flanagan, J. having been of counsel in the cause, and incompetent to participate in the decision for that reason, and the remaining judges having been equally divided at the last term and being equally divided at this term, the judgment of the court below is affirmed without costs in accordance with the provisions of Burns’ 1946 Repl., §2-3232.
Separate opinions follow.
Separate Opinion
Dra…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Rudd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Mershon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- McClary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Stipp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leedy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953