Legal Opinion

Unger v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 24, 1964No. 466-61PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

This is an action to recover retainer pay as a member of the Fleet Reserve pursuant to section 203 of the Naval Reserve Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1175, 1178, providing for the transfer of enlisted men to the Fleet Reserve upon the completion of either 16 or 20 years of active naval service, with retainer pay based upon length of service, and the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802, providing for the retainer and retired pay of enlisted personnel of the U.S. Navy.

The case arises on cross-motions for summary judgment and the following facts are pertinent: Plaintiff first enlisted in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Goldstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Peterson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Healy v. BeattyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1969
  2. Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API