Legal Opinion

Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenberger, J.

In this contract dispute between appellant, the City of New York, and respondent, a private plumbing contractor, we are called upon to determine the continuing vitality of the longstanding rule enunciated in Borough Constr. Co. v City of New York (200 NY 149 [1910]), and to strike a balance between the conflicting interests of the municipality in ensuring timely completion of public projects and of the private contractor in preserving contractual limits on the risks it has assumed. Respondent was ordered to perform certain work which, according to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Weil Plumbing Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Fehlhaber Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Fehlhaber Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Fowler Electric Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API