Sherrill v. Town of Wrightsville Beach
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
In their first two issues presented on appeal the petitioners argue that (1) the superior court should have remanded the case back to the board of adjustment for findings of fact with regard to the denial of the variance request, and (2) the superior court should have compelled respondent to grant the requested variances. We disagree. G.S. 160A-388(d) provides:(d) When practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships would result from carrying out the strict letter of a zoning ordinance, the board of adjustment shall have the power, in passing upon appeals, to vary or modify any of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3Cited by20 opinions
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Tate Terrace Realty Investors, Inc. v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Willis v. City of Southport Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Board of Zoning Appeals of James City County v. University Square AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Guilford County Department of Emergency Services v. Seaboard Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.