Legal Opinion

AU Hotel, Ltd. v. Eagerton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 9, 1996No. 2950276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AU Hotel, Ltd., appeals from a judgment declaring that AU Hotel is not exempt from ad valorem property taxation. We affirm.

The Industrial Development Board of the City of Auburn ("the Board") constructed a hotel and conference center ("the Facility") upon land leased to the Board by Auburn University. The Board then leased the Facility to AU Hotel, a limited partnership, and AU Hotel subleased the conference center to Auburn University. AU Hotel contracted with Richfield Hotel Management for Richfield to operate the Facility. AU Hotel is designated as the sole "user" of the Facility under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Anniston City Land Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Brundidge Milling Company v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1969
  4. City of Montgomery v. WATER WORKS AND SANITARY SEWER BD., CITY OF MONTGOMERYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte Fleming Foods of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Emerald Mountain Expressway BridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Patterson v. EMERALD MOUNTAIN EXP. BRIDGECourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Faulk v. Motors Insurance Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API