Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kurilla

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1990No. 2582PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Robert Kurilla appeals from an order denying his motion to quash a criminal information. We quash the appeal.

The criminal complaint charged Kurilla with unlawful receipt of public assistance, in violation of 62 Pa.S. § 481. He was held for trial following a preliminary hearing. Pursuant to Rule 306 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure, Kurilla filed a pretrial motion to quash the information, alleging that a four-year statute of limitations under the Public Welfare Code would prohibit prosecution of any conduct pre-dating four years from filing the criminal complaint. The Honorable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. KilgallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. BunterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. ReaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. WintSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Com. v. Capps, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Gotshall, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API