Sturtevant v. Wineland
Nebraska Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
On February 7, 1887, the plaintiff in error filed his petition in error in this court. The summons in error seems to have been issued, served, and returned. No transcript, however, has ever been filed, and the attorney of the defendant in error now moves to dismiss the proceeding in error, principally upon the ground that no transcript has been filed. This motion was heard after notice had been given to the plaintiff in error of the. pendency thereof. The motion must be sustained. There being no transcript filed, there is nothing before the court except the petition in error,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Stull v. Cass CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Tootle, Hosea & Co. v. ShireyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Dane County Bank v. GarrettNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Ayres v. AmsberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1920