Hall v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
The defendant was convicted of maliciously killing a heifer cow. He assigns error on the judgment overruling his motion for a new trial. There was ample evidence to show that the defendant, while under the influence. of intoxicating liquor, was driving a Ford car “about as fast as it could run,” with flve other boys in the car, “all whooping and hollering,” and that while so driving he purposely turned out of the road about six feet and struck the heifer, and did not stop to see if the calf was killed 'or was suffering, or to make explanation of his act or reparation therefor. The evidence…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Cronin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Quick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940