Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered July 18, 2005, which granted defendants’ motion and cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
*269A notice of claim must provide sufficient information as to location (General Municipal Law § 50-e [2]) so that governmental authorities have an adequate opportunity to investigate (Teresta v City of New York, 304 NY 440, 443 [1952]; Edgehill v City of New York, 260 AD2d 597 [1999]). Housing Authority investigators were unable to locate the place of the alleged occurrence from the description…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Williams v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Reyes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Edgehill v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cruz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Carrero v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Taylor v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Williams v. MTA Bus Co.New York Supreme Court · 2014