Dahler v. Meistrell.

On Rehearing.

In his motion for rehearing, defendant in error reiterates and re-argues matters contained in his original brief, at the same time asserting some additional points and arguments not contained therein. One of these points is that in our main opinion in the present case, *823we say that after plaintiff had given the mortgage on his farm for $6187.85, Meistrell called np yonng Henry Enorp and had him turn over the bank stock in question. Defendant in error now argues that, therefore, this bank stock did not enter into the transaction and was no part of the consideration for the same,…