Tillamook City v. Bogart
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed on court’s own motion for want of jurisdiction since no constitutional issue is presented in this appeal from conviction for violation of a city ordinance. ORS 221.360. See, City of Portland v. Trumbull Asphalt, 2 Or App 1, 463 P2d 606, Sup Ct review denied (1970); City of Salem v. Kimball, 5 Or App 49, 482 P2d 191 (1971).
In situations like this city attorneys would he well advised to file motions to dismiss, as we previously suggested in footnote 1 in City of Salem v. Kimball, supra.
Appeal dismissed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Portland v. Trumbull Asphalt CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- City of Salem v. KimballCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Mt. Angel v. Van CleveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. KingsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- City of Klamath Falls v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977