Massery v. State

I concur in affirming the order of revocation. I also concur in the certified question because it accurately reflects the facts in this case.

I write only to respond to any implication which may be drawn from the certified question that our holding in Peters v. State, 919 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), is not applicable to all revocation proceedings. The reasoning of this court in Peters as to the application of Crawford to lab reports is equally applicable to all revocation proceedings.

Finally, a decision by this court declaring Crawford applicable in community supervision revocation…