Legal Opinion

Regis Corp. v. Fusco Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 20, 1986No. 86-34PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Regis Corporation, the plaintiff at trial, appeals a final order which ruled that they had not sustained monetary damages and were estopped from seeking injunctive relief based upon a commercial lease’s exclusivity clause. We reverse.

Appellee Fusco is the landlord of the Sunshine Mall in Clearwater. Appellant Regis is a tenant in the mall. The initial 1967 lease for the premises was between both appellant’s and appellee’s predecessors in interest. In 1977, Fusco and Regis entered into a lease extension and addendum which incorporated the terms of the original lease.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Tompkins Land and Housing, Inc. v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Paragon Group, Inc. v. HoeksemaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Jones v. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walgreen Company v. Sara Creek Property Company, B v. A/K/A Sara Creek Beta, and Phar-Mor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Walgreen Company v. Sara Creek Property Company, B v. A/K/A Sara Creek Beta, and Phar-Mor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API