Legal Opinion

Franken v. Franken

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided April 18, 1898Published

1Opinion of the CourtJelke, J.

I am of the opinion that this action should be maintained in the name of and on behalf of the state.

The act says so; “enter into a bond to the state of Ohio, in the penal sum.”

The language of the bond says so; “ bound unto the state of Ohio in the penal sum of one thousand dollars, to be paid to said state of Ohio.”

“Where a thing is prohibited by statute under a penalty, if the penalty, or part of it, be not given to him who shall sue for the same, it goes and belongs to the king.” Rastall’s Entries, 433 ; 2 Hawkins, P. C., c. 26.

Where a statute does not in terms declare in whose name a suit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. PettyOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  2. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API