Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Phillips

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. Crim. 21374Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BIRD, C. J., Concurring and Dissenting.

—Although I concur in the judgment, I write separately because the lead opinion’s analysis of the errors regarding the admission of “other criminal activity” evidence (see former Pen. Code, § 190.3, subd. (b)1) and the prejudice that ensued raises significant questions.

I

In an attempt to ensure the accused a fair penalty phase trial, my colleagues suggest that in many cases it may be advisable for the trial judge to make a preliminary determination out of the presence of the jury as to whether there is substantial evidence to prove each element of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API