Legal Opinion

Gerard Kurpet v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1996No. 94-70400Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

78 F.3d 593

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Gerard KURPET, Petitioner,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-70400.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 9, 1996.*

Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, I & NS No. Aar-wmn-lpd.

INS

REVIEW DENIED.

Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Eziquio Calderon-Medina, United States of America v. Evaristo Rangel-GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. VELASQUEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1986
  5. Elvira Magallanes-Damian v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Monica Gallegos-Ares v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Marisol Montero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Candalaria Garcia-Quesada v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Jose Gallegos-Arrez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Engracia Saucedo-De Gallegos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lucia Solis De Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API