Heinze v. Arthur's Executors
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ■ The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohford
This is an action at law, brought in the Superior Court of the city of New York, July 15, 1874, by Otto Heinze and Francis Gross against Chester A. Arthur, collector of the port of New York, to recover $174.99, as duties paid under protest on gloves made of cotton and silk. The goods were entered at the custom-house of the port of New York, January 14, 1874, and the duties were .paid the same day. The protest was filed February 6, 1874, and an appeal was duly taken to the Secretary of the Treasury, February 24, 1874, and decided April 30, 1874. The suit was duly removed by the defendant into…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Schell's Executors v. FauchéSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Arthur v. UnkartSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. M. Rice & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.