Legal Opinion

State v. Board of Excise Commissioners of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 30, 1911Published

On rule to show cause why mandamus should not issue.

1Opinion of the Court

*476■Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by

Gumaiere, Chief Justice.

The relators presented a written complaint, duly verified, to the board of excise commissioners of Jersey City against one Hugh Mehan, a licensed vendor of intoxicating liquors, alleging that he had violated the supplement of April 13th, 1906, to the act to regulate the sale of intoxicating liquors {Pamph. L., p. 199) by obstructing with a curtain á clear view of the interior of his saloon on Sunday, the 10th day of October, 1909, and by selling intoxicating liquor on that day; and praying that an order be made by the board…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. ReppSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API