State v. Board of Excise Commissioners of Jersey City
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why mandamus should not issue.
1Opinion of the Court
*476■Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by
Gumaiere, Chief Justice.
The relators presented a written complaint, duly verified, to the board of excise commissioners of Jersey City against one Hugh Mehan, a licensed vendor of intoxicating liquors, alleging that he had violated the supplement of April 13th, 1906, to the act to regulate the sale of intoxicating liquors {Pamph. L., p. 199) by obstructing with a curtain á clear view of the interior of his saloon on Sunday, the 10th day of October, 1909, and by selling intoxicating liquor on that day; and praying that an order be made by the board…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. ReppSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910