Legal Opinion
Hales v. Commercial Bank of Spanish Fork
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1948No. 7046PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff sued defendants on two counts for alleged defamation. In the first cause of action plaintiff alleged that defendant Dixon, while acting as cashier of defendant bank, said of plaintiff to Max Packard:
“I figured that Duane had taken the check, forged his mother’s name and taken the money.”
In the second cause of action, plaintiff alleged that said cashier, in the presence of Max B. Hales, said of plaintiff:
“You can even see where he cut off the top of the check and changed the date on it,”
and that
“The best thing for him to do is to pay off the check because the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Klinck v. . ColbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Edwards v. KevilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Sanders v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Wayment v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
- Combes v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- O'CONNOR v. BurninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Ferguson v. Williams & Hunt, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.