Legal Opinion

Harrington Co. v. Frank

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 16, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

This matter comes before the court upon motion of Adam Frank, a member of the New York bar, and one of the defendants in the action, to open a final decree foreclosing tax sales certificates. It is an appeal to the discretion of the court.

It appears from the moving papers that the procedure adopted by the defendant does not follow the practice now established. Our court of errors and appeals, in one of its latest deliverances, speaking through Mr. Justice Parker, and reviewing the case ofMitchell v. Mitchell, 96 N.J. Eq. 29, does not sanction the procedure followed by the defendant, but says…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API