Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rudolph Lee, Jr. v. Andrew J. Winston, Sheriff Aubrey M. Davis, Jr., and Gerald Baliles Circuit Court, City of Richmond, Division I

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1983No. 82-6762Published

1DissentWidener, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

*902I

Schmerber, infra, has decided that an involuntary intrusion, made under protest, and even unaccompanied by court order or other process, into the human body is not necessarily a violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures from the person. What we have to decide is whether a perfectly routine surgical procedure to extract a bullet nine-tenths of an inch below the surface of the skin imbedded in the deltoid muscle near the left collarbone violates the Fourth Amendment when accomplished under a general anesthetic.

Among the many…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API