Legal Opinion
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 25, 2013No. Case No. 2:12cv548PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court following a Markman hearing, conducted for the purpose of construing nine disputed claim terms in the patents-in-suit. After careful consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties and the arguments advanced at the Markman hearing, the Court issues the following Opinion and Order detailing the claim constructions in this case.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
At issue in this case are six patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,899,492 (“the '492 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,050,711 (“the '711 patent”), U.S. Patent No.…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Charter Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019