Legal Opinion

State v. Shaffona Morgan (069967)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 8, 2013No. A-119-11PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner

In this case, a trial judge had two ex parte discussions with a jury, while it was deliberating, and allowed the jurors to take home written copies of part of the jury instructions. Settled ease law makes clear that ex parte communications with a jury are improper and must always be avoided. In addition, when a judge gives written instructions to a jury, the relevant court rule requires that the instructions be available for review in the jury room and nowhere else.

Both ex parte communications were recorded and transcribed. Despite the errors in this case, the record affirmatively shows that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States v. ReskoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HollahanIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State of New Jersey v. Wedpens DorsainvilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  3. Tomikia Davis v. Abbas Husain, M.D. (072425)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. State v. J.T.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ERIC MENZZOPANE (2014-10, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API