Tow v. Rafizadeh (In Re Cyrus II Partnership)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON WELLSPRING SOURCING CO., LIMITED’S MOTION TO DISMISS (relates to docket no’s 538)
MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge.
For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Wellspring Sourcing Co., Limited’s Motion to Dismiss. This Court has jurisdiction of this proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157.
Background
On April 24, 2008, Wellspring Sourcing Co., Limited (“Wellspring”) filed a motion to dismiss seeking dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(4) and (5) for insufficiency of process and insufficiency of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. A. H. Fischer Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- In Re the Arbitration Between Trans Chemical Ltd. & China National MacHiney Import & Export Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Mark Morrel Ruth Morrel v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Curtis v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whyenlee Indus. Ltd. v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Herminio Castillo, Jr. v. Chad Thomas, et al.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
- Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology LimitedDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
- Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Occupational & Medical Innovations, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- Whyenlee Industries Ltd. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019