District of Columbia v. Carr
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
The District of Columbia appeals the trial court’s judgment that the District violated the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment by using its distraint power in appellees’ commercial building in a manner inconsistent with the lease agreement between ap-pellees and the distrained tenant. Although concluding that the District acted within its statutory and constitutional authority under the government’s taxing levy and distraint powers when it physically seized the tenant’s store, the court further concluded that the District's failure to abide by the tenant’s lease…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duk Hea Oh v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010