Blackman-Uhler Chemical Division, Synalloy Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentWinter, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion, in my view, strains the facts and ignores the controlling principles of law.
I
The case turns upon the text of the union “handout,” a one-sheet broadside clearly calculated to assert that the employer was reaping tremendous profits while treating its employees unfairly. As the majority notes, the document identified its source for the financial statement set forth therein as “Synalloy Corporation Six-Month Report to Stockholders.” While this reference may indicate the origin of certain data, it far from explains its true meaning. Nothing in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Company, Inc., United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sumter Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Celanese Corporation of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Henderson Trumbull Supply Corporation v. The National Labor Relations Board, Region 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. G. K. Turner AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.