Legal Opinion

Groehn v. Corporation & Securities Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1957No. Docket 50, Calendar 46,782PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Here we are concerned with disciplinary action against a civil servant! His superior, the commissioner of the Michigan corporation and securities''commission, discharged him. The hearing hoard, of the civil service commission sustained the discharge. The civil, service commission itself, however, rescinded the order of discharge and reinstated him, but suspended him for 3 months. He contends, before us, that even the suspension was improper.

The plaintiff is Harold Groehn. He is a' lawyer and practiced for several years, specializing in real-estate and probate law, before entering the service…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skutt v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Plec v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hackett v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Council No 11, Afscme v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hanlon v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. International Union of Civil Rights & Social Service Employees v. Michigan Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Righter v. Adrian Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API