Legal Opinion
Munro v. Autosports Designs, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*822OPINION OF THE COURT
Burton S. Joseph, J.
Application by petitioner Archie Munro for a judgment pursuant to Lien Law § 201-a cancelling a garage keeper’s lien filed by respondent Autosports Designs, Inc. (Autosports) is denied in part.
The petitioner is the owner of a rare and exotic motor vehicle, a 1983 Ferrari 512 Boxer, of which respondent Condor Capital Corporation (hereinafter Condor) is a lienholder. In November 1998, the petitioner contacted Autosports, a motor vehicle repair shop in Mineóla, New York, which specializes in the repair of luxury and exotic cars, to repair the damage…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Eland Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc. v. Laurel Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Slank v. Sam Dell's Dodge Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Harrison v. RubenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. One Stop Auto & Truck Centers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McGreen v. On Point Collision, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002