Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kinney's Executors

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Nueces. Tried below before tbe Hon. J. B. Hurd. The character and material facts of this case are clearly disclosed in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was commenced in the District Court of Nueces county on the seventh day of November, 1860.'

The plaintiff, Smith, alleges that Henry L. Kinney, on the twenty-second day of December, A. D. 1852, being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2228 71, made and delivered to him his promissory note of that date for the sum of his- indebtedness.

H. L. Kinney, S. W. Fullerton and M. P. Norton are made defendants, and are all duly served with process. The note was made due and payable in six months after date, and bore ten per cent, interest. .The plaintiff demands judgment for his debt…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Dingman v. BeallIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kountze v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Jenkins v. McNeeseTexas Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Bremond v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API