Legal Opinion
In re Hamilton Street
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Reargument of motion to confirm referee’s report.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
Upon the reargument of the motion to confirm the referee’s report herein, a careful examination of the cases cited against such confirmation has been made, aided by many original condemnation records also submitted.
By various mesne conveyances, the descriptions in all of which were by metes and hounds and in identical language, Mary B. Trimble, on August 28, 1901, became the owner in fee of certain property in the borough of Queens. Before 1888, this considerable tract of city land contained certain projected streets (of whieh Hamilton street was one) as out*370lined upon a map referred to as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duryea v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Magee v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In re Mayor, Aldermen, & Commonalty of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- In re Opening of Seventh AvenueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Harris v. Kingston Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CottleNew York Supreme Court · 1917
- In re Opening Hamilton StreetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911