Legal Opinion

Stony H. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 3, 2026No. 7:25-cv-00056Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION STONY H.1, § PLAINTIFF, § § V. § CASE NO. 7:25-CV-56-BK § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY § ADMINISTRATION, § DEFENDANT. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff’s appeal of the denial of his application for Social Security disability benefits and supplemental security income, Doc. 1, is before the undersigned United States magistrate judge for determination. For the reasons outlined here, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Perez v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Kernis J. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Uwe Taylor v. Michael Astrue, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. Olivia Kneeland v. Nancy Berryhill, Acting CmsnrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API