Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Work

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1933No. 5516PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge SHORT

of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the court.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case (17 S. W. (2d) 174) contains a full statement of the nature and result of this litigation, which statement we adopt. The District Court of Chambers County sustained a general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition and dismissed the plaintiff’s case. The Court of Civil Appeals held that this was error, and reversed and remanded the case for another trial. We think the Court of Civil Appeals was correct in this particular. However, the Court of Civil Appeals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camp v. Gulf Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Texas Portland Cement & Lime Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Juencke v. Terrell, CommissionerTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. Consolidated Louisiana Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914
  5. Cockrell v. WorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Short v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Weatherly v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. United Production Corp. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  4. United Production Corp. v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Butler v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API