Legal Opinion
People v. Saaratu
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert L. Cohen, J.
The District Attorney, in presenting evidence to a Grand Jury, has served Grand Jury subpoenas for the testimony of two doctors who operated on defendant and discovered during the course of the operation alleged controlled substances *1076which were removed from defendant’s stomach and turned over to the police.
The defendant has moved to quash those subpoenas on the ground that the physicians’ prospective testimony before the Grand Jury would violate CPLR 4504 (a), which bars disclosure, unless waived by the patient, of any information which was acquired by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. DecinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In re Grand Jury Investigation of Onondaga CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- MTR OF CAMPERLENGO v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- The People v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- People v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Almonte v. New York Medical CollegeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- People v. FigueroaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. Gearhart, New York County Courts1990
- State v. MosesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. GomezNew York Supreme Court · 1990