Legal Opinion

Population Services International v. Carey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 5, 1979No. 74 Civ. 1572PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PIERCE, District Judge.

Attorneys for plaintiffs in the above-entitled action seek an order pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, 1 the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fee Awards Act of 1976, declaring the defendants’ liability for attorney’s fees. In addition, they request the Court to fix the amount of such attorney’s fees at $116,516.25 and the amount of costs and disbursements at $4,759.75, for a total of $121,276.00.

Plaintiffs originally brought this action challenging the constitutionality of a New York statute which prohibited distribution of contraceptives to persons over the age of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Daly v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Williamsburg Fair Housing Committee v. Ross-Rodney Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. In Re Media Vision Technology Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
  4. Stenson v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. Ross v. SaltmarshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API