Legal Opinion

Thayer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1925No. C-579Published

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff was an enlisted man in the Army, and from a date prior to July 1, 1919, to June 12, 1921, was assigned to and in performance of duty in charge of engineer property and fatigue at the Military Academy. The act of March 30, 1920, making appropriation for the support of the Military Academy for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1921 (41 Stat. 541), carried a provision, under the title “Extra Pay for Enlisted men,” as follows: “For extra pay for one enlisted man on duty in charge of engineer property and fatigue at 50 cents per day, $156.50.” The plaintiff sues to recover this sum, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Campagna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1891
  4. Manning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  5. Schwanz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API