Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 29, 1982No. CA CR 82-64PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

David Honor Johnson, Jr. appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and theft of property having a value of less than $100, contending that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the convictions. We do not agree.

He first contends that the State failed to prove that Meperidine, which he was charged with possessing, was a controlled substance. As originally enacted the Controlled Substances Act listed and scheduled the specific drugs which were prohibited and delegated authority to the “Coordinator” to add, delete or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Wilbert Jackson v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Briggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API