Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MacDonald

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 2004PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) appeals from the trial court’s order granting David MacDonald’s motion for summary judgment. State Farm contends that the trial court erred in finding that MacDonald’s homeowner’s insurance policy, issued through State Farm, provided coverage for a pending wrongful death suit filed against MacDonald. Upon review, we find no merit in State Farm’s assertion. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶ 2 MacDonald owned a residence located in Eighty Four, Pennsylvania upon which he obtained homeowner’s insurance through State Farm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Charles D. Stein Revocable Trust v. General Felt Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Tenos v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Uguccioni v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. PrevatteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company v. Christian J. Pilosi James C. PilosiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Allstate Insurance v. DrumhellerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. American National Property & Casualty Co. v. SorensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Serino v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Williams v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API