Legal Opinion

United States v. Delano

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 26, 2008No. 4:07-cv-00566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

[Resolving Doc. 25, 26]

JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge.

In this Opinion and Order, the Court determines the admissibility of tangible evidence and statements obtained after a June 3, 2007 traffic stop. The United States seeks to offer this evidence against Defendants Randy Delano and Loreal Johnson. Specifically, the Defendants challenge the initial stop and the seizure of Johnson. Defendant Johnson also says that subsequent statements that she made should be suppressed as fruits of the poisonous tree. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Defendant Delano’s motion and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Pacheco-AlvarezDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  2. United States v. YounisDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API