Legal Opinion

Gjertsen v. Haar

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2015No. S-14-0106PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T 1] Pursuant to a California court order, Herman Ter Haar (Father) has sole legal and physical custody of the parties' child (the child), subject to limited visitation by Heidi Gjertsen (Mother). Mother appeals from the district court's order denying her petition for modification of the California order pertaining to custody, care and visitation with the child. We conclude the district court erred by failing to give full faith and eredit to the terms of the California order which specifically allowed a change in the terms of visitation when it would be in child's best…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Basolo v. BasoloWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Montenegro v. DiazCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Leitner v. LonabaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  4. TR v. Washakie County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hanson v. BelvealWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Johnson v. CliffordWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bishop v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Womack v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Andrew P. Johnson v. Katie L. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API